2x AMD EPYC 9175F (Turin, 16-channel DDR5-6400 total)
Compare 2x AMD EPYC 9175F (Turin, 16-channel DDR5-6400 total) against another machine in the Arena
Reference: Epyc on Wikipedia
- Class
- CPU
- Memory
- 768 GB DDR5-6400 (16 channel total, 8/socket - not full 12ch/socket population)
- Runs (Q4_K_M)
- —
- Bandwidth
- 753.6 GB/s
- TDP
- 640 W
- Released
- 2024-10-10
- Price (US)
- $35240 new as of 2026-08
Sourcing and disambiguation notes
753.6 GB/s is MEASURED by the source with likwid-bench across both sockets at NPS1, against 819.2 GB/s theoretical for 16 channels of DDR5-6400 -- 91.9% of theoretical. Only 8 of the 12 available channels per socket are populated, so this sits below a fully populated Turin build. Two 16-core EPYC 9175F on an Asrock TURIN2D16T; TDP is summed from AMD's 320W per-CPU spec. The build total assumes the same 8 channels per socket as this entry's id, so a reader planning full 24-DIMM population should scale the memory line up by roughly half. Breakdown: CPUs ~$6,688, board ~$1,100, and 16x32GB DDR5-6400 RDIMM ~$27,450. Memory is about 78% of the total and is the single biggest source of uncertainty here -- re-check it first. No used price: the 9175F was released in October 2024 and has essentially no secondary market.
Specification sources
- https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/11733 — forum, 2025-02-18
Measurements
Decode is token generation — the speed you feel while an answer streams. Prefill is prompt processing — the wait before it starts. Why bandwidth predicts decode speed.
No records yet for this hardware. Know of a published benchmark on it? Submit the link.
What verified, single-source and estimated mean, and the same rows with every filter and sort in the benchmarks explorer.
Speed over time
What it can run
Fit is arithmetic, not a measurement — how it is computed. Against 768 GB; models that fit are listed largest first.
No modeled quant fits in 768 GB.